The race would have to shift dramatically to put Democrats back on track for a contested convention.
The Super Tuesday delegate count is still in flux, but Joe Biden appears to have racked up more delegates than any other candidate — though not yet enough to be on track for a majority.
It takes more than 50 percent of pledged delegates to win the nomination, and right now it does not seem that Biden will emerge from Super Tuesday with 50 percent of pledged delegates allotted so far. A New York Times forecast from early Wednesday morning suggested he’d end up with around 45 percent, though that’s subject to change as more votes are counted.
So to turn this around and get back on track for a majority, Biden doesn’t need to just win states going forward — he needs to win a solid majority of all pledged delegates in the rest of the primaries and caucuses before the convention.
That is entirely achievable for Biden, particularly since most other candidates have dropped out and all future delegates will likely be split between him and Sanders. (If Biden wins Florida as hugely as a new poll shows, for instance, he could be back on track for a majority very quickly.) But in a race that’s been volatile so far, it’s also at least possible that Biden’s momentum will ebb, or that Sanders could surge back into contention.
So what happens if Biden (or Sanders, if he manages to get back into first place) falls short of a pledged delegate majority when voting concludes in June?
There are several possibilities, including the dreaded “contested convention” — where the nomination remains unsettled when Democratic delegates go to Milwaukee, leading to frantic behind-the-scenes bargaining and dealmaking, and a chaotic scene overall. (Democrats fear this outcome will spotlight division and hurt their chances to beat President Trump.)
But even in a “no majority” outcome, a bitterly contested convention wouldn’t be inevitable. The Democratic Party would have very strong incentives to settle things before the convention — and could theoretically do so, if a deal is reached among the candidates or delegates. They also have another failsafe: the superdelegates, who get to vote on the second round if no one got a majority initially.
The recipe for a contested convention is: No candidate can put together a majority, at least two candidates are still in the race, party dealmaking efforts fail, and the delegates dig in.
But that scenario is getting unlikelier. If Biden continues to win most states and delegates, we probably won’t end up there, especially now that Bloomberg has quit the race and Warren is reportedly exiting too. A very dramatic shift in the race would be necessary to put Democrats back on track for one.
If Democrats’ pledged delegates remain split among three or more candidates, then it’s possible no one will end up with a majority — by hitting the magic number of 1,991 — of those 3,979 pledged delegates.
What happens next? It depends.
That’s because the delegates, in addition to being a sort of scorekeeping metric during the primary, are actual people. And those actual people technically have the power to determine who gets the Democratic nomination.
For one, there’s the question of the pledged delegates for candidates who have dropped out. Already, it looks like former or soon-to-be-former candidates Elizabeth Warren, Mike Bloomberg, Pete Buttigieg, and Amy Klobuchar will combine for at least 100 delegates, and potentially nearly 200. Some of these delegates could be crucial in getting Biden or Sanders above that majority threshold.
What happens to them? Again, it’s complicated. Josh Putnam has a rundown of the possibilities at his site Frontloading HQ. Whether a candidate formally quits or just “suspends” their campaign is important, as is whether the delegates at stake are district-level or state-level. But basically, some of these delegates slots will become uncommitted (fully free to support whomever they want), while others will be reallocated to candidates still in the race.
More broadly, there is plenty of time between the conclusion of primary voting in early June and the convention in mid-July for some sort of deal to be crafted — among the delegates or the candidates to whom they are pledged.
In every recent cycle, delegates merely rubber-stamped the results of the primaries and caucuses. But if those results are inconclusive or disputed, then the delegates will have to — somehow — work something out.
So it probably makes sense to assume that most of the delegates for a candidate will do what that candidate wants. But they don’t technically have to, because a candidate doesn’t outright control his or her delegates.
Whether a deal comes together or not probably depends on several factors:
It’s entirely possible that a deal among the candidates or pledged delegates proves too difficult to strike before the convention. However, there is still a failsafe that could mean the nomination is effectively settled beforehand: the superdelegates.
Under the new Democratic rules for 2020, the first vote on the nominee at the convention is determined only by the 3,979 pledged delegates. But if there is no majority winner, then the 771 superdelegates get to join the fray, starting with the second round of balloting. (And since more delegates are voting, the magic number needed for a majority rises to 2,376.)
Superdelegate slots are given to people based on their positions in the Democratic Party, mostly to DNC members and members of Congress. (Technically there are 775 people who are superdelegates, but eight of them get half a vote each, because Democrats can never make anything simple.)
In past cycles, many superdelegates have been very public about whom they’re backing. So it’s possible that the leading candidate could finish short of a pledged delegate majority, but have enough superdelegate endorsements publicly announced to ensure they can win on the second ballot.
So if this is the case, then the 2020 Democratic convention might be the first major party convention since 1952 to go to a second ballot on the presidential nominee — but it wouldn’t really be a contested convention, with the outcome truly up for grabs.
Another wrinkle in the way the Democratic convention is run is that, though the superdelegates don’t get to vote on the first ballot for the presidential nominee, they do get to vote on matters related to the convention beforehand — including on what the rules of the convention should be.
The DNC has issued temporary convention rules, but the final rules package will have to be approved by the delegates themselves. That could theoretically include a last-minute change that would avert the need for a second ballot — say, by letting superdelegates vote initially, or by letting the plurality winner get the nomination.
But if the nomination in question, such a change would be extremely controversial — and supporters of the second-place candidate would surely cry foul.
Instead, a last-minute rules change effort (or challenges to delegates’ credentials) has often been tried by candidates who are losing, or elements of the party opposed to the frontrunner.
For Democrats in 1972, Sen. George McGovern had won a majority of delegates. But his candidacy faced stiff resistance among some elements of the party, so his rivals launched a challenge. Specifically, they argued that California’s winner-take-all delegate allocation (which gave McGovern all the Golden State’s delegates) violated party rules. But the challenge eventually failed, and McGovern won the nomination.
Similarly, in 1980, President Jimmy Carter had clearly won a majority of delegates. But his challenger, Sen. Ted Kennedy, argued that the convention should change its rules to free delegates from their pledges and fully let them vote their conscience. This challenge also failed, and Carter won the nomination.
In the modern era, a major party’s national convention is usually a coronation. The winner of the nominating contest has already been settled by the results in primaries and caucuses across the country. So the convention is a carefully stage-managed PR event to formalize a long-known outcome. It’s about getting the nominee’s message out to voters, not about picking the nominee.
The difference at a contested convention is that the outcome isn’t yet settled: The question of who the nominee will be is still at least somewhat disputed. So rather than being a venue for happy-talk unity, the convention becomes a battleground — or, more rosily, a negotiating session among the delegates.
Arguably, conventions featuring rules challenges like Democrats’ in 1972 and 1980 can be characterized as contested conventions — each featured a serious, organized effort to depose the nominee, though neither succeeded. Republicans’ 1976 convention, a contest in which President Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan had to woo uncommitted delegates before the first ballot vote (Ford won enough), could also qualify.
But the classic contested convention scenario most think of is: No candidate gets a majority on the first ballot, and then the delegates have to vote again, and if necessary again, and again, and again, until a winner emerges with a majority.
This was common enough in conventions of yore. Before primaries and caucuses were given such importance, nominees truly were chosen by delegates at the convention, as factions of the party tried to come to a consensus. The term “smoke-filled room” is often used to describe Republicans’ 1920 convention. The 1924 convention went through an incredible 103 rounds of balloting. Sometimes a “dark horse” candidate who wasn’t in contention can emerge as a surprising pick.
But no presidential nominating vote has gone to a second ballot since 1952. And as modern conventions have become PR and messaging events, the parties have come to fear the messiness and disunity that would be given a national spotlight in a serious contest.
Naturally, many in the party will likely try their hardest to avoid a bitterly contested convention. In the end, though, it really does come down to what the candidates and delegates choose to do.
Yet the stronger Biden looks, the less likely this outcome is — and unless Sanders dramatically changes the dynamics of the race quite soon, a contested convention will be very unlikely.
Author: Andrew Prokop
Read More
Rihanna at the 2015 Met Gala. | J. Countess/FilmMagic Turns out the first Monday in…
AI-powered apps may be able to use your data (including selfies) to predict your current…
Guidance counselor Jacquelyn Indrisano embraces ninth grader Arianna Troville, 16, outside her office at East…
Franco Zacha for Vox Your neighborhood watering hole is more important than you think. Meng…
Signs hang at George Washington University’s Gaza solidarity encampment, created by students in conjunction with…
Palestinians in eastern Rafah migrate to Khan Yunis after the Israeli army’s announcement on May…