Exclusive: Democrats have a new plan to keep millions of laid-off workers insured

Exclusive: Democrats have a new plan to keep millions of laid-off workers insured

Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA), chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee, and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) are seen after a news conference on October 15, 2019. | Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

House Democrats will unveil a bill to dramatically expand COBRA subsidies for laid-off and furloughed workers.

A new bill from House Democrats, previewed exclusively to Vox, aims to give laid-off or furloughed workers a way to stay on their health insurance plan at no extra cost to them — through increased subsidies with the existing health insurance plan COBRA.

COBRA allows laid-off workers to keep buying into their health insurance plans. But there’s a big catch: It can be prohibitively expensive because laid-off people are on the hook for their part of the insurance premium as well as their employer’s part (on average, $7,200 for an individual and more than $20,000 for a family).

“That can be easily $1,000 a month, and if you just lost your job, you don’t have $1,000 a month,” House Committee on Education and Labor Chairman Bobby Scott (D-VA), a main bill sponsor, told Vox in an interview Monday.

The new bill, called the Worker Health Coverage Protection Act, is Democrats’ proposal to fix a growing problem due to the economic fallout from coronavirus: people losing their employer-sponsored health insurance. An April 2 Economic Policy Institute report estimated as many as 3.5 million people could have lost the health insurance they got through their employer in the previous two weeks. The timing is not ideal. The middle of a deadly global pandemic is a particularly bad time to be uninsured; intensive care for coronavirus treatment can cost tens of thousands of dollars.

House Democrats’ bill would expand COBRA to cover 100 percent of the cost of a person’s health insurance premiums. Importantly, it would also cover 100 percent of premiums for furloughed workers — temporarily laid-off workers whose employers have promised they will return to work when economic conditions improve, and who still get health insurance through their employer.

“It’s affordable because if you don’t have a job you’re going to get significant subsidies,” Scott said. “It’s much more functional to keep your COBRA payments so you can keep your provider network, keep the deductible you had.”

How the bill would work and where it stands

COBRA has been around since the mid-1980s, but the program got extra subsidies during Congress’s 2009 economic stimulus bill, when it covered about 65 percent of a laid-off person’s health insurance premium costs. Still, lawmakers later found that wasn’t enough to get people on board with the program if their costs were still too high.

“Not everybody enrolled and people had gaps in coverage,” said Katherine Hempstead, a senior policy adviser at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. “People felt pinched for dollars, and when they feel pinched for dollars they don’t want to do something even if it’s subsidized.”

The Worker Health Coverage Protection Act would expand that to 100 percent coverage, both for laid-off workers and furloughed ones. In the case of laid-off employees, these new COBRA subsidies would cover both the employee and employer portions of the premium costs. In the case of furloughed workers, the bill would just cover the cost of the employee’s premiums because the employer would continue to pay in as well.

“This proposal should be favored by providers, since it will increase their likelihood of receiving higher commercial rates from these workers,” said Hempstead. “Also, this is advantageous for insurers that are in the employer market but not the marketplace.”

The concept of this is not unlike the recent expanded unemployment insurance passed by Congress in the CARES Act — an attempt to make laid-off workers close to financially whole again. But while expanded unemployment insurance ends in July, the proposed expanded COBRA subsidies would likely continue after.

“We’re talking about a health pandemic. Obviously health care is extremely important because if anybody is infected and has to go to the hospital, the course of treatment varies widely,” Scott said. “Some don’t get any treatment at all, some are in intensive care for many days. It’s so random and that’s why insurance is so important.”

It’s worth noting Democrats view this as a temporary proposal to make sure more people can get affordable health insurance during a time of crisis. But both former Vice President Joe Biden’s public option proposal and Sen. Bernie Sanders’s Medicare-for-all bill are well to the left of the COBRA subsidy. Adding COBRA subsidies isn’t a panacea, but it’s an important piece of the overall health insurance landscape.

“There are some systems in place; COBRA is one of them and subsidizing COBRA is huge,” Hempstead said.

Even with generous subsidies, it’s important to note the bill won’t cover everyone; while 49 percent of Americans get their health insurance through their employer, many people who have been laid off work in restaurants or retail — and smaller businesses don’t necessarily provide insurance to their employees. People who got their insurance through the ACA marketplace, for instance, could be in a tough spot.

There are certainly still some gaps in COBRA as well; it doesn’t cover workers from small businesses with fewer than 20 workers, although a number of states have extended the program to small businesses.

The bill will be introduced later this week, and a companion bill is forthcoming in the Senate. Democrats plan to try to negotiate it into the next coronavirus package Congress takes up, although the timeline for such a package is still up in the air. Whether Republicans will get on board with the bill is also unclear.

“We’ll do the best we can with a Democratic House and Republican Senate,” Scott said. “If they want to cover COBRA, the legislative language is ready to go with the proposal.”

New COBRA subsidies could help fill gaps in insurance coverage

COBRA has been underutilized in the past because it is too expensive for many people. But if more people are able to access it with these extra subsidies, it could possibly help fill a large gap in insurance coverage.

As Vox’s Dylan Scott recently wrote, other options for health care coverage include special enrollment for the Affordable Care Act’s private insurance markets. Lower-income people could be eligible for Medicaid. But finding out if you’re eligible for either can sometimes take a while. COBRA is faster because you’re keeping your insurance plan rather than signing up for a new one.

“Getting unemployed workers onto COBRA can happen very quickly, without the sometimes complex eligibility process involved in Medicaid and the ACA marketplace,” said Larry Levitt, senior vice president at the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Even with all of COBRA’s existing cost problems, the key benefit to the program is continuity in coverage. It allows a laid-off worker to keep his or her network and doctor rather than having to lose their health insurance and providers and potentially having to sign up for an entirely new network when they get a new job. If someone is in the middle of a medical treatment, it means a lot less upheaval and paperwork for them.

“COBRA would allow people who lose their jobs to maintain their same insurance and doctors, which could be important in the middle of a public health emergency,” Levitt said.

No one knows how long the coronavirus economic crisis will last. But this proposal could go a long way toward keeping people on their health insurance until they reenter the workforce.


Support Vox’s explanatory journalism

Every day at Vox, we aim to answer your most important questions and provide you, and our audience around the world, with information that has the power to save lives. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower you through understanding. Vox’s work is reaching more people than ever, but our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources — particularly during a pandemic and an economic downturn. Your financial contribution will not constitute a donation, but it will enable our staff to continue to offer free articles, videos, and podcasts at the quality and volume that this moment requires. Please consider making a contribution to Vox today.

Author: Ella Nilsen

Read More

RSS
Follow by Email