Categories: Politics

Facebook and YouTube have restricted Alex Jones and Infowars. Spotify hasn’t, and people are upset.

Backlash against Alex Jones’s Infowars network is growing. Spotify users are the latest to speak out.

These days, trying to track the progress of inflammatory right-wing conspiracist Alex Jones and his cult conspiracy show Infowars is a bit like playing whack-a-mole.

Facebook recently suspended Jones’s personal account, in what appeared to be a shift away from CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s permissive statements regarding Infowars and other loci of misinformation on the site.

YouTube also took a blow at the conspiracy-monger last week, removing four videos from Jones’s Infowars channel because they violated “longstanding policies against child endangerment and hate speech.” Infowars is notorious for peddling racist rhetoric and especially for propagating the false belief that the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting was a hoax.

But no sooner had Facebook and YouTube users celebrated these wins than reporters and Spotify users noticed that the audio streaming platform was continuing to host episodes of Infowars — and describing Jones as a “media analyst and seasoned radio broadcaster.”

Users also voiced concerns and spoke out about the show. One Twitter user claimed that Spotify told her if her idea submission to remove the show got at least 100 votes, the company would look into it. At press time, it had nearly 700. Some musicians whose work is hosted on Spotify also spoke out.

This isn’t the first time in recent weeks that Spotify has come under fire for hosting controversial content. In May, as further information on the allegations of sexual abuse and misconduct against rapper R. Kelly came to light, the company initially hastily deployed a new “hateful content policy” and used it to temporarily stop promoting R. Kelly’s music on its curated playlists. However, it rapidly backtracked and killed the policy, claiming that its role was “not to regulate artists.”

It seems as though Infowars’ nebulous claim to be a media outlet rather than a source of fake news makes it difficult for platforms to police its content. For instance, Facebook’s decision to ban Jones’s personal account but not the Infowars Facebook account has also come under some scrutiny, highlighting the murkiness of Facebook’s rules and guidance system for “striking out” its users.

And though Spotify is currently taking the most heat for hosting Jones’s shows, it’s not alone in doing so: Infowars also appears on Apple Podcasts.

Vox has reached out to Spotify for comment.

Author: Aja Romano
Read More

Vox - Huntsville Tribune

Recent Posts

We could be heading into the hottest summer of our lives

The US approved a Texas power emergency as a blackout threat loomed due to a…

2 hours ago

How today’s antiwar protests stack up against major student movements in history

George Washington University students camp out on campus to demand that their university divest from…

3 hours ago

You need $500. How should you get it?

The (bad) options for Americans facing an emergency expense. A 2023 Federal Reserve survey found…

22 hours ago

So you’ve found research fraud. Now what?

Carolyn Fong/The Washington Post via Getty Images Harvard dishonesty researcher Francesca Gino faked her research.…

24 hours ago

How JoJo Siwa’s “rebrand” got so messy

JoJo Siwa performs at Miami Beach Pride Festival on April 14, 2024. | Sean Drakes/Getty…

1 day ago

Student protests are testing US colleges’ commitment to free speech

Columbia University students participate in an ongoing pro-Palestinian encampment on their campus following last week’s…

1 day ago