Categories: Politics

Introducing Impeachment, Explained with Ezra Klein

Amanda Northrop/Vox

We’re living through history. This new podcast helps us make sense of it.

On Saturday, October 19, I’m launching a new podcast: Impeachment, Explained. We are likely about to witness the third impeachment of an American president. It’s a historic event. And understanding it is going to require some history.

I first fell down the impeachment rabbit hole back in 2017, when President Donald Trump was tweeting recklessly about nuclear war with North Korea. Was impeachment a remedy for an out-of-control executive? What did “high crimes and misdemeanors” mean? What would impeaching a dangerous president do to the country? What would not impeaching a dangerous president do to the country?

Impeachment, I learned, was richer, stranger, and more essential than I’d understood. For one thing, “high crimes and misdemeanors” didn’t mean literal crimes. As the Cato Institute’s Gene Healy notes in his excellent study, “Indispensable Remedy: The Broad Scope of the Constitution’s Impeachment Power,” the 1828 edition of Webster’s American Dictionary of the English Language defined “misdemeanor” as “ill behavior; evil conduct; fault; mismanagement.” The dominance of the legal definition — a small crime carrying up to a year in jail — came later.

Over the next year, the likely impeachment of Donald Trump will dominate American politics. But it will be shaped by the impeachments that came before him, by politicians and lawyers and scholars and activists and media moguls who never imagined him.

This podcast will follow the two threads of impeachment simultaneously. Every Saturday, we’ll begin with a quick tour of what we learned that week that actually matters. All signal, no noise. But then we’ll dive into the deep machinery, ideas, and political and geopolitical context that will shape the impeachment process. What’s the definition of “high crimes and misdemeanors?” How are impeachment trials conducted? What happens if the president refuses to cooperate with the inquiry? What can we learn from the impeachment inquiries launched against Andrew Johnson, Bill Clinton, and Richard Nixon — or the more numerous impeachments of federal judges?

You can subscribe to Impeachment, Explained on Apple, Spotify, Stitcher, or wherever you get podcasts.

Author: Ezra Klein

Read More

Vox - Huntsville Tribune

Recent Posts

How the world wastes hundreds of billions of meals in a year, in three charts

The UN reports that over a trillion dollars worth of food gets thrown out every…

1 hour ago

The UK’s controversial Rwanda deportation plan, explained

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak conducts a press conference on a plan to stop illegal migration…

2 hours ago

Should humans get their own geologic era?

The debate over the Anthropocene epoch, explained. The word “Anthropocene” has gained cultural resonance in…

18 hours ago

The longshot plan to end the war in Gaza and bring peace to the Middle East

President Joe Biden and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman arrive for a photo during…

19 hours ago

No one wants to think about pandemics. But bird flu doesn’t care.

Rescued chickens gather in an aviary at Farm Sanctuary’s Southern California Sanctuary on October 5,…

1 day ago

The Supreme Court: The most powerful, least busy people in Washington

Six Supreme Court justices attend President Joe Biden’s 2024 State of the Union address. |…

1 day ago