What happened to Hill could discourage other women — especially younger and LGBTQ women — from seeking careers in the public eye.
When Rep. Katie Hill, the California Democrat who announced her resignation on Sunday, admitted to a sexual relationship with one of her campaign staffers, she didn’t hesitate to call it “inappropriate.” Anti-sexual harassment advocates have long pointed out that employers having relationships with subordinates raises troubling issues of consent.
But the media coverage that led up to her resignation didn’t always focus on issues of consent or employer ethics. Instead, the Daily Mail, for example, chose to publish multiple nude photos of Hill, along with a variety of allegations that have nothing to do with relationships with staffers or misconduct of any kind. The website accused Hill of “posing nude on ‘wife sharing’ sites,” for example, something that has no bearing whatsoever on her job as a member of Congress.
In fact, the allegations against Hill only became public after nude photos of the Congress member were shared with the conservative website RedState without her consent. Hill says her husband, with whom she is in divorce proceedings and whom she has called abusive, is responsible.
Everything about Hill’s story, from the way it became public to the way the Daily Mail and other websites encouraged readers to examine her naked body, is inextricably tied to the fact that Hill is a woman. Sexual misconduct allegations against men like Sen. Al Franken or Rep. Blake Farenthold were generally treated as political issues, not salacious stories about people’s sex lives. (Both men ultimately resigned.)
“You cannot even imagine this happening with a male congressman,” Brianna Wu, a candidate for Congress in Massachusetts and advocate for privacy legislation, told Vox.
You all deserve to hear from me about why I made this devastating decision and where things go from here. I said the fight continues. I mean it, and I hope you’re with me. https://t.co/ogKkyW7I6f
— Katie Hill (@KatieHill4CA) October 28, 2019
Today, sharing nude photos with romantic partners is something a lot of adults do. But those photos are often weaponized — one in 25 Americans say they’ve been the victim of “revenge porn,” or malicious sharing of photos without their consent, according to a 2016 report. Women are more likely to be threatened with revenge porn than men, and women are arguably more at risk of the kind of salacious reaction Hill received, especially if they’re in public life.
As Hill acknowledged, she had a serious lapse in judgment, and her resignation wasn’t necessarily unexpected. But her story also appears to be an example of a revenge porn campaign that worked, driving its target from her chosen career. Some say that could discourage women, especially younger women who have dated since the advent of phone cameras, from running for office or seeking positions of power. As Wu put it, “they’re going to look at this situation and say, boy, what if I’m the next one?”
Since the allegations broke, the focus has been on nude photos and salacious details — not ethical issues
The allegations against Hill first surfaced earlier this month, when the conservative website RedState reported that Hill and her husband, Kenny Heslep, had engaged in a two-year romantic relationship with a woman in her 20s who worked on Hill’s congressional campaign. RedState also published photographs of the women, including one that appeared to show Hill naked.
The site also reported that Hill was in a relationship with a current congressional staffer, Graham Kelly. She has admitted to the relationship with the campaign staffer, but said she was never in a relationship with Kelly.
Where the official rules of the House of Representatives are concerned, the allegation about Kelly was more serious. Since last year, House ethics rules have prohibited sexual relationships between members of Congress and their congressional staff. The rules do not explicitly apply to campaign staff.
But for many outlets, the focus of the story was the naked pictures and the details of her relationships, not whether she violated ethics rules.
In particular, many outlets chose to focus squarely on Hill’s relationship with the female staffer, not on the allegations around Kelly. RedState published multiple stories on Hill’s supposed “throuple” (a term for a romantic relationship among three people that Hill herself has not used). Some even shared the purported photo of Hill and the staffer on Twitter, prompting the company to take the tweets down, according to the New York Times.
The epitome of the focus on Hill’s relationship with a woman, though, was probably a Daily Mail story published on Thursday. “Hill’s wild lifestyle has been laid bare in a cache of texts and intimate photographs obtained by DailyMail.com,” the website reported, “as sources revealed Hill and Heslep also posted her naked photos online under a thread called ‘WouldYouF**kMyWife.’”
The story also included multiple naked (though censored) photographs purporting to be of Hill, including several of Hill alone that had nothing to do with her relationship with the staffer. The story ranged far beyond the allegations of inappropriate relationships to talk about relationships she and her husband allegedly had before her campaign, in which there was no apparent suggestion of professional misconduct, as well as relationships the staffer allegedly had after her breakup with the couple.
The Mail is known for salacious stories about famous people — other recent headlines include “REVEALED: Liam Hemsworth ‘building new home’ next door to Miley Cyrus and Cody Simpson’s love nest …after ‘applying for a permit’ before their split.” Still, the story was revealing for its extensive focus on Hill’s body and sexuality, rather than on any of the factors in her history that have bearing on her fitness to serve in Congress.
Overall, coverage of the allegations against Hill has been highly sexualized. “She’s an attractive blond woman,” Wu said, “and there’s certainly a salacious aspect to it.”
Not only is Hill a woman, she is also one of the first openly bisexual people in Congress —her sexuality may also have influenced coverage of the allegations against her, especially the fact that the relationship with the female staffer has drawn more attention than the allegations of a relationship with Kelly. “This is, to some degree, about the sexualization of lesbian relationships,” said Wu, who is bisexual.
Even one of Hill’s Republican colleagues has said Hill was being treated unfairly. Rep. Matt Gaetz, a staunch Trump ally, tweeted on Thursday that Hill “isn’t being investigated by Ethics or maligned because she hurt anyone — it is because she is different.”
This is just absurd. The only person who seems to have a gripe is @RepKatieHill’s soon-to-be ex.
Who among us would look perfect if every ex leaked every photo/text?
Katie isn’t being investigated by Ethics or maligned because she hurt anyone – it is because she is different. https://t.co/Czrc2k8z8X
— Matt Gaetz (@mattgaetz) October 24, 2019
For example, Hill’s treatment is much different than that of Al Franken. In 2017, when radio host Leeann Tweeden said that then-Sen. Franken had kissed her without her consent and mimed grabbing her breasts in a photograph, people scrutinized the photo in question because it was a key part of the allegation (which was soon joined by several more). Media outlets didn’t promote scrutiny of Franken’s body or of his sex life outside of misconduct allegations.
Other male members of Congress who resigned after allegations like sexual misconduct, such as Blake Farenthold or Rep. John Conyers, also have not seen their bodies plastered across websites.
Of course, no one leaked nude photos of these men. But even in a case where a man’s nude photos did become public, at least one media outlet managed to make the story about a woman’s body, too.
In 2016, when former Rep. Anthony Weiner was accused (again) of sending nude photos to a woman not his wife, the New York Post published several of the images. But in the same story, it also published multiple photos of a woman Weiner had allegedly sexted. She was shown in her underwear, with her face blurred out. The headline: “Anthony Weiner sexted busty brunette while his son was in bed with him.”
The Post story is just another reminder of something Hill has now learned all too well — women’s bodies are used as clickbait in ways that men’s are not.
Hill’s story could discourage women from high-profile careers
No discussion of the allegations against Hill is complete without an acknowledgment of how they came to light. According to Hill, photographs of her were shared without her consent. She has said her soon-to-be ex-husband is responsible. “The fact is I am going through a divorce from an abusive husband who seems determined to try to humiliate me,” she said in a statement to the Washington Post earlier this month.
Hill’s relationship with a campaign staffer raises serious ethical questions, and might have led to her resignation regardless of the manner in which it was revealed. But the release of the photos meant that Hill was also subjected to repeated invasion of privacy that had nothing to do with the public debate over her inappropriate relationship — her constituents and colleagues did not need to see her naked body to decide whether she should remain in Congress.
Women are more likely than men to be threatened with the nonconsensual sharing of explicit images, also known as revenge porn, according to a 2016 report by the Data & Society Research Institute. Women under 30 are especially at risk, with 10 percent saying they’ve been threatened with revenge porn at some point. People who are gay or bisexual are also much more likely to be threatened than straight people.
“For a lot of the men in Congress, the kind of electronic record of their sex lives simply did not exist in the same way,” Wu notes. For example, in 2018, the average age of a member of the House was nearly 58 years old.
Hill, however, is a millennial. Taking nude photos for private use is “something that is much more common for younger people,” Wu said.
Many fear that what happened to Hill could discourage other women — especially younger and LGBTQ women — from seeking careers in the public eye.
Young women today may be looking at Hill’s situation and thinking, “what if my ex-boyfriend publishes these pictures of me?” Wu said. “I think it has a really chilling consequence on who is allowed to run for office and who isn’t.”
Others have voiced similar concerns. “There’s so much that people do about women and their sexuality that’s about shaming them,” Sen. Kamala Harris, a candidate for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, told BuzzFeed News on Monday. The release of the photos of Hill “sends a signal to other women that’s discouraging them from running for office.”
Harris has sponsored a bill making the publication of intimate photos and videos a federal crime, according to BuzzFeed. Wu, meanwhile, says the publication of such photos should be seen as a privacy issue, and lawmakers need to work with tech companies on policies that would help contain nonconsensually shared images. “We’ve got to have a 21st century discussion about what privacy means,” she said.
Hill has said that after her resignation, she will devote her time to fighting revenge porn.
“I have to take my personal fight outside the halls of Congress,” Hill said in a video statement released on Monday. “I will fight to ensure that no one else has to live through what I just experienced.”
She has a difficult road ahead of her.
Author: Anna North