Mueller has been conducting a broad investigation into Trump and his associates’ Russia ties going far beyond Manafort.
Now that Paul Manafort has been found guilty of financial crimes, where does that leave special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation?
Two years after the probe began, and 15 months after Mueller took charge of it, what investigators have found on the central question — whether there was a conspiracy between Trump associates and Russians to interfere with the 2016 election — remains deeply mysterious.
We’ve seen Trump aides charged with (Rick Gates) and convicted of (Paul Manafort) separate financial and lobbying crimes. We’ve seen Trump aides charged for lying to investigators about their contacts with Russians (George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn). And we’ve seen 25 Russians charged with interfering with the campaign (through social media or email hacking).
But no Trump aide has yet been charged with actually working with Russia or other foreign actors to interfere with the election. As a result, the president and his defenders have loudly claimed that Mueller has come up empty on the main topic he was supposed to be investigating.
In reality, we have no idea what Mueller has or has not found so far regarding “collusion.” But we know that investigation into Trump-Russia ties is still very active.
This year, the special counsel’s team has surprised Russian oligarchs at airports, subpoenaed Trump’s business for documents, investigated mysterious meetings with a Russian fund manager in Seychelles, studied the Trump campaign’s digital operations and the Trump inauguration’s fundraising for potential Russian ties, dug further into Don Jr.’s infamous Trump Tower meeting, and hauled a plethora of Roger Stone’s associates before a grand jury. They’ve also engaged in a back-and-forth with Trump’s lawyers about questions they want him to answer.
And now the lawyer for Michael Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer, is claiming that Cohen, who pleaded guilty in federal court on Tuesday, is saying that Cohen has information Mueller might be interested in — which, if true, could spark new avenues for the investigation.
Overall, though, Mueller’s ultimate endgame in all this remains far from clear. Will the investigation fizzle out without any further actions of note? Or are we headed for a new series of indictments coming even closer to Trump’s inner circle? Or will Mueller’s team submit a report to Congress laying the grounds for possible impeachment of the president of the United States? The special counsel, unsurprisingly, isn’t saying.
The big picture is that while Manafort’s conviction is in a sense a milestone for investigators, as it’s their first victory at trial, it’s also something of a sideshow. Unless the verdict spurs Manafort to start cooperating with investigators — something he’s shown no signs of considering so far — it won’t necessarily mean much for the many other moving parts of Mueller’s Russia investigation, which have been in motion for some time.
So far, the actual charges the special counsel has brought fall into three main buckets:
As serious as these charges are, it is true that none of them directly allege that Trump associates criminally conspired with Russians to interfere with the 2016 election.
However, many believe that Mueller is using these indictments as, essentially, building blocks for his larger case on that central matter.
They’ve made the case that Russia truly did interfere with the 2016 election, and revealed more specifics about how that happened: via hacking and social media influence campaigns. They’ve also caused three former Trump aides — Papadopoulos, Flynn, and Gates — to become cooperators, which has opened up new areas of investigation.
Though Mueller’s team has been amazingly leak-proof, we have gotten clues about what they’ve been up to through leaks from people they’ve come into contact with — the people they’ve questioned, their lawyers, and other government officials involved in certain aspects of the probe.
The takeaway from many of those accounts matches that of Kristin Davis, a longtime associate of Roger Stone who testified before the grand jury last week. “I think they’re genuinely concerned about whether or not any collusion happened with Russia,” Davis told CNN’s Chris Cuomo. “Their line of questioning really did revolve around whether or not this happened.”
Indeed, this year Mueller’s investigators have delved deep into Trump and his associates’ ties to Russia with the apparent goal of understanding whether a conspiracy to interfere with the 2016 election did take place, and if so, what it entailed.
It’s worth keeping in mind that we have no idea if any charges will end up being brought on any of these matters — it’s possible that some of these investigative avenues led nowhere, or that the evidence is too thin on some. However, also keep in mind that this isn’t by any means everything that Mueller is investigating, either.
The bigger picture is clear — Mueller has conducted an extremely thorough investigation going beyond Paul Manafort that has focused on whether Donald Trump and people in his orbit criminally conspired with Russia to interfere with the 2016 campaign. And that investigation is not yet over.
Author: Andrew Prokop
The debate over the Anthropocene epoch, explained. The word “Anthropocene” has gained cultural resonance in…
President Joe Biden and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman arrive for a photo during…
Rescued chickens gather in an aviary at Farm Sanctuary’s Southern California Sanctuary on October 5,…
Six Supreme Court justices attend President Joe Biden’s 2024 State of the Union address. |…
Flights to LaGuardia Airport were delayed last June due to smoke and poor visibility. |…
Jessica Gunning as “Martha” in Baby Reindeer. | Ed Miller/Netflix With the Baby Reindeer fallout, the paradox…