The Judiciary Committee had asked Ford to respond by 10 pm on Friday.
A lawyer for Christine Blasey Ford — a Palo Alto University professor who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault — says Ford needs more time to determine if she will testify about the allegations in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee next week, according to an email shared by the Washington Post’s Seung Min Kim.
Committee Chair Chuck Grassley had previously demanded a response from Ford by 10 pm on Friday evening — a deadline that her attorney Debra Katz criticized as “arbitrary.”
Katz asked for another day for Ford to weigh the decision, one that Katz described as having “life-altering implications” for Ford and her family.
Grassley signaled that the committee was open to holding a hearing with Ford and Kavanaugh on Wednesday, but Ford had said that she would not be able to commit to an appearance that early in the week, Katz noted. Katz also argued that the committee’s strict Friday night deadline was “aggressive and artificial,” and counter to claims that the panel wanted to genuinely consider Ford’s perspective.
“You have been tasked with pressuring Dr. Ford to agree to conditions that you find advantageous to the nominee,” Katz wrote.
Ford, who accused Kavanaugh of forcing himself on her while they were at a party in high school, has said she wants to cooperate with lawmakers and is interested in having her story heard. Kavanaugh has unequivocally denied the accusation.
One of Ford’s attorneys had said Thursday that it was “not possible” for Ford to attend the public hearing originally scheduled for Monday, but that she “wishes to testify, provided that we can agree on terms that are fair and which ensure her safety,” according to an email obtained by the Washington Post.
As a Republican senator told Politico, the committee has agreed to some of Ford’s requests, which include ensuring that she and Kavanaugh are not in the same room and limiting the number of cameras that are present. “We’ll do it on Wednesday, we expect the accuser before the accused and we do intend to have the counsel do the questioning,” the senator, who was not named, said.
Republicans on the committee have indicated that they were interested in moving ahead with a vote on Kavanaugh’s nomination if Ford didn’t testify. Grassley appeared to follow through on this threat by scheduling a committee vote on Kavanaugh for Monday, which would take place if Ford does not commit to testifying.
“In the event that we can come to a reasonable resolution as I’ve been seeking all week, then I will postpone the committee vote to accommodate her testimony. We cannot continue to delay,” Grassley said in a Friday statement.
Ford had previously said she wouldn’t testify unless the FBI first conducted an investigation into the allegations, but it doesn’t look like that’s going to happen anytime soon.
Judiciary Republicans, the Department of Justice, and President Donald Trump have all thrown cold water on the idea of an FBI investigation. Grassley on Wednesday said it was not the job of the FBI to weigh the “credibility” of these allegations.
Ford’s announcement on Thursday that she will likely testify had seemed to end several days of uncertainty about whether she would appear before the committee, though the specifics are still very much in flux. An attorney for Ford, Lisa Banks, argued that the pace and structuring of the process have been fundamentally unfair.
“The Committee’s stated plan to move forward with a hearing that has only two witnesses is not a fair or good faith investigation; there are multiple witnesses whose names have appeared publicly and should be included in any proceeding,” Banks wrote in a statement.
Ford and Kavanaugh were originally the only two witnesses expected to testify. Democrats have argued that others, including Mark Judge, whom Ford implicated in the assault as part of her accusation, should speak as well.
Ford had said that Judge helped Kavanaugh push her into a bedroom at the party and was intermittently encouraging Kavanaugh during the alleged assault. Judge has said he has no recollection of this incident and that he never saw Kavanaugh act in this way.
Ford’s call for an FBI probe echoes one that Democrats have been making ever since she came forward. The review they are pushing wouldn’t be a new criminal investigation but a reopening of Kavanaugh’s existing background check. The FBI may not be responsible for determining how seriously to consider allegations, but the agency plays a pivotal role in fact-finding and interviewing witnesses, they argue.
In the wake of Anita Hill’s sexual harassment allegations against Clarence Thomas in 1991, President George H.W. Bush directed the FBI to open an investigation. The agency interviewed Hill, Thomas, and at least one other witness, after which the White House determined that Hill’s allegations were “unfounded.”
It’s well within Trump’s ability to do the same, but thus far, he’s shown little inclination that he’s interested in doing so. Ford’s anticipated decision to testify suggests she’s accepted the outcome and remains ready to speak out on her own rather than let the process continue without senators hearing what she has to say.
Author: Li Zhou
